Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

. Last Updated: 07/27/2016

Good Model for Small Business


HAS SOMETHING you read in The Moscow Times startled you? Are you angry, excited, puzzled or pleased? If so, write and tell us what's on your mind.
We welcome letters to the editor and have devoted this space to printing your comments. You can send your letter directly to Opinion Page Editor by e-mail at; by fax at (7-495) 232-6529; or by post to The Moscow Times, 3 Polkovaya Ulitsa, Bldg. 1, Moscow, Russia, 127018. (If you are writing from abroad, send it to The Moscow Times, c/o IPS, 666 5th Ave, Suite 572, New York, NY 10103.)
Write in English or Russian. Praise us, criticize us or give us new ideas. Do you detect a bias in our coverage? Let us know. Think we did a good job? Please tell us.
All we ask is that you include your full name, the city from which you are writing and a contact telephone number in case we need to get in touch.
We do edit letters for grammar and style. In some cases, we cut long letters in order to fit the available space -- though we try to take care not to distort or water down your point.
We look forward to hearing from you!

In response to "How a Russian FedEx Could Save the Economy," a comment by Thomas Nastas on Feb. 19.


Nastas is absolutely on the money.

I was involved with economic development for many years and wanted to form a Small Business Investment Corporation. I wanted to do it through a nonprofit organization, but a group of private investors enlisted the largest insurance company in my area to invest in such a company.

SBIC is a great idea, and I hope this concept will one day bring the same benefits to Russia by supporting the development of small and medium-size enterprises.

Donald Rowan

Montpelier, Vermont

U.S. Is Convenient Enemy

In response to "Russia Is Much Smarter This Time," a comment by Yevgeny Bazhanov on Feb. 20.


Bazhanov's article lays the early groundwork for explaining why even with Barack Obama as president, the relationship between Russia and the United States will be strained.

It is only further proof that Russia needs the United States as the enemy.

Allen Karpman


Don't Make Trouble

In response to "A Rich Tradition of Toadyism," a comment by Oleg Gordievsky on Feb. 13.


Is Gordievsky a troublemaker? Writing bad things about people is only good if it helps the country. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has saved Russia and Russia should thank him for it.

Gordievsky has lived in Britain for more than 20 years so he should know the English saying, "If you have nothing good to say, then don't say anything."

David Victor


Czechs Oppose U.S. Radar

In response to "Don't Cave In to Moscow," a comment by Milan Vodicka on Feb. 12.


I read Vodicka's piece with great interest -- all the more so since I am Czech and have been working in Russia for five years.

But when the author writes: "The Kremlin is attempting to dictate the limits of Czech and Polish sovereignty and foreign policy. ... This, at least, is how the situation appears from the Czech point of view," I feel this to be an overstatement.

How does the author know?

How many Czechs has he asked?

In all the public opinion polls I have seen so far, the Czech radar station, which the United States had planned to install as part of a missile defense system, was opposed by a large segment of the Czech population.

Karel Vavruska


Look Who Is Talking

In response to "Superpower Price of $2Bln," a column by Alexander Golts on Feb. 10.


Golts' argument reminds me of when former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld visited China in 2004 and said the United States was worried about Beijing's defense spending, which was scheduled to increase at a lower rate than the country's growth in gross domestic product.

Rumsfeld made this comment at a time when the Pentagon had already put its "pre-emptive war doctrine" into practice twice.

I agree that Russia should probably have more important priorities than the beefing up its military during an economic crisis, but the United States seems even more inept in this regard. It is mired in a crisis no less serious than Russia's, but the Pentagon continues to spend more on its military than all other nations combined spend on their defense budgets.

Christophe Trontin