Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

. Last Updated: 07/27/2016

U.S. Ads Link Drugs With Terrorism

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration's new anti-drug advertising campaign seeks to strike a chord with young people by linking drug use to supporting terrorism.

But it has struck a nerve with critics who contend the message is inappropriate and goes too far.

The criticism, from both traditional opponents of White House drug policy and individuals who typically support anti-drug messages, has produced parodies, editorials, debate and even research, although the advertisements have been out for only two months.

Proponents call the advertisements powerful and factual. Critics say that the link between drug use and terrorism is overreaching wartime propaganda.

John Walters, director of the White House drug office, said the idea for connecting drug use and terrorism came after the State Department identified 28 terrorist organizations and linked nearly half of them to drug trafficking.

The campaign began with two 30-second spots by Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide, part of the WPP Group, during Super Bowl XXXVI for about $1.9 million each. The commercials are running on at least eight networks or cable channels, while print ads are in nearly 300 newspapers.

The first 30-second spot, called "I helped," shows a series of young people saying things like: "I helped murder families in Colombia -- it was just innocent fun." "I helped a bomber get a fake passport -- all the kids do it." "I helped blow up buildings -- my life, my body." It ends with the tag line: "Drug money supports terror. If you buy drugs, you might, too."

The second 30-second spot, called "AK-47," follows the style of MasterCard's "priceless" advertisements by McCann-Erickson Worldwide Advertising in New York, a unit of the Interpublic Group of Companies. Images of rental cars with trunks full of automatic weapons, a safe house and a man buying box cutters -- poignant images for American viewers after Sept. 11 -- are flashed on the screen followed by: "Where do terrorists get their money? If you buy drugs, some of it might come from you." Variations of the "I helped" advertisements are running in more than 300 newspapers.

Critics, including some parents, say that the advertisements' negative-niche strategy is unlikely to be effective.

"It's a colossal waste of money," Jane Marcus, a mother of two and member of the Parents and Teachers Association in Palo Alto, California, said of the advertisements. "The argument is fallacious to begin with and plays on people's fears -- the two aren't connected," she said of the link between terror and drug abuse.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director for the Drug Policy Alliance, which favors a strategy based more on treatment, said: "This is a shameless exploitation of the war on terror. The government is trying to bolster a failing war on drugs by linking it to the war on terrorism." His nonprofit group paid $8,000 to parody the ads in Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper.

Walters said that while there was no way to measure the effectiveness of the advertisements yet, reaction to the spots had been enough to persuade him to extend the campaign through the summer and to add several new advertisements.

The drug office used focus groups and consulted with the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration to develop the ads. They are the most widely tested spots since the media campaign began in 1998, when Congress approved nearly $1 billion over five years for the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, Walters said.

The campaign's web site (www.mediacampaign.org) includes a list of several events, from the detonation of terrorist car bombs in Colombia to the murder of Mexican officials with AK-47s, to support the claims of the ads.